Palazzo Dona'Events in Venice have something to do with the past...as perhaps most events do in a way. This new movie, la linea generale is totally of the present, while the dialoguewas written in 1630 by Galileo Galilei from his works
and read, in italian by Giorgio Agamben. The movie was presented by the Signum foundation Palazzo Dona', and there was aconversation with Daniel Heller-Roazen, Ernesto Rubin de Cervin
and P. Adams Stiney after the showing.
A premovie discussion with Oleg Tcherny in the foreground setting up the audio...
Just about ready to begin.
..."If the nib of a writing pen which was in the ship during my voyage direct from
Venice to Alexandria, had had the power of leaving a visible mark of all its path, what trace, what mark, what line would it have left? "Simplicio. It would have left a line stretched out thither from Venice not perfectly straight, or to speak more correctly, not perfectly extended in an exact circular arc, but here and there more and less curved accordingly as the vessel had pitched more or less ; but this variation in some places of one or two yards to the right or left, or up or down in a length of many hundred miles, would have occasioned but slight altera- tion in the whole course of the line, so that it would have been hardly sensible, and without any great error we may speak of it as a perfectly circular arc. Sagred. So that the true and most exact motion of the point of the pen would also have been a perfect arc of a circle if the motion of the vessel, ab- stracting from the fluctuations of the waves, had been steady and gentle ; and if I had held this pen constantly in my hand, and had merely moved it an inch or two one way or the other, what alter- ation would that have made in the true and principal motion? Simpl. Less than that which would be occasioned in a line a thousand yards long, by varying here and there from perfect straightness by the quantity of a flea's eye. Sagred.
An accurate view of the film.
If then a painter on our quitting the port had begun to draw with this pen on paper, and had continued his draw- ing till we got to Alexandria, he would have been able by its motion, to produce an accurate representation of many ob- jects perfectly shadowed, and filled up on all sides with landscapes, buildings, and animals, although all the true, real, and essential motion of the point of his pen would have been no other but a very long and very simple line ; and as to the peculiar work of the painter, he would have drawn it exactly the same if the ship had stood still. Therefore, of the very protracted motion of the pen, there remain no other traces than those marks drawn upon the paper, the reason of this being that the great motion from Venice to Alexandria was common to the paper, the pen, and everything that was in the ship; but the trifling motion forwards and backwards, to the right and left, communicated by the painter's fingers to the pen, and not to the paper, from being peculiar to the pen, left its mark upon the paper, which as to this mo- tion was immoveable. Thus it is like- "...The three had an animated and clear discussion of movie making, incorporating comments from the audience and related thoughts as to philosophy, semiotics, and the making of meaning in film.
The film was shot with a long telephoto lens in one take, aboard a ship leaving Venice. It was then digitally edited to adjust time. One of the effects was that the Alps loomed large and fixed over Venice while the foreground- Venice itself- began to blur.







No comments:
Post a Comment